SNDT WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY
BMK Knowledge Resource Centre
Vithaldas Vidyavihar, Juhu Tara Road,
Santacruz (West) Mumbai - 400049
Effect of sorghum pre-processing (roasting and germination) on the replacement level and quality of sorghum-wheat bread: bread characteristics, digestibility, consumer acceptability and microbiological analysis
Vijay Singh Sharanagat
Effect of sorghum pre-processing (roasting and germination) on the replacement level and quality of sorghum-wheat bread: bread characteristics, digestibility, consumer acceptability and microbiological analysis - p253–267
The present study was focused on the replacement of refined wheat flour (RWF) by control (CS) and processed sorghum flour [germinated (GS) and roasted (RS)] on the properties of flour/batter/dough (particle size, XRD, pasting, dynamic rheology, farinograph) and bread (physical, textural, digestibility, microbiological and sensory). Prominent variations adhered with sorghum processing, but decreasing patterns occurred for flour–water absorption, dough stability times, storage modulus, peak/final/breakdown viscosities, bread-moisture content, specific volume, porosity, and lightness. Flour’s pasting temperature, dough development time, breadbulk density, hardness, gumminess, and bitterness increased. Composite flours mainly had weak nature compared to RWF. The baking loss was lower for 10–30% CS and GS incorporation than RS. Composite bread had higher in-vitro protein and starch digestibility (CS > GS > RS) than RWF. Three days storage life with acceptable quality scores was obtained for bread with CS and GS up to 20% and RS up to 30% incorporation.
Low-gluten bread
Sorghum
Digestibility
Shelf-life
Effect of sorghum pre-processing (roasting and germination) on the replacement level and quality of sorghum-wheat bread: bread characteristics, digestibility, consumer acceptability and microbiological analysis - p253–267
The present study was focused on the replacement of refined wheat flour (RWF) by control (CS) and processed sorghum flour [germinated (GS) and roasted (RS)] on the properties of flour/batter/dough (particle size, XRD, pasting, dynamic rheology, farinograph) and bread (physical, textural, digestibility, microbiological and sensory). Prominent variations adhered with sorghum processing, but decreasing patterns occurred for flour–water absorption, dough stability times, storage modulus, peak/final/breakdown viscosities, bread-moisture content, specific volume, porosity, and lightness. Flour’s pasting temperature, dough development time, breadbulk density, hardness, gumminess, and bitterness increased. Composite flours mainly had weak nature compared to RWF. The baking loss was lower for 10–30% CS and GS incorporation than RS. Composite bread had higher in-vitro protein and starch digestibility (CS > GS > RS) than RWF. Three days storage life with acceptable quality scores was obtained for bread with CS and GS up to 20% and RS up to 30% incorporation.
Low-gluten bread
Sorghum
Digestibility
Shelf-life